Sunday, August 16, 2009

"Lonely."

Lonely.
If you get to obsessed with something--or more specifically, someone--then it's hard to be away from them. Even for a littly while. You'll feel this sense of being deserted and being lonely, but all that really means is in truth you are perfectly happy. You know you take your alone time...so what's wrong with them taking their's? You shouldn't fell offended. It's just human nature. It's hard being alone, not talking, but it's a perfect time to remember to yourself, or your friends.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Theory #8

I have this theory about kids who never get their work done in elementary school....
Either they are having one of these problems:

A) They're not getting enough attention at home
B) They're abused or mistreated at home
C) They saw others doing it and getting away with it and they tried to take the easy way out
D) They dislike their family, their life, and the people around them so much that they feel they
don't have to be anything because they're not expected to

Alot of problems start at home, that's because that's where your mainly nurtured at taught. All these children need is a role model to look up to...not screaming kids/teachers.

I donno...just a theory...

Sunday, May 10, 2009

Theory #7

You know, you should save everyone you possibly can in any situtation. I'm going to go by the oldest one in the book:
A building is on fire, who do you save, 2 siblings or 5 strangers?
If you said both that's the worst answer you can give. That's means that you're going to kill yourself trying to save everyone...but really you'll end up saving no one.
If you said two siblings, that's probably because they're your family, right? Well, everyone is your family. So, your brain should of automatically translated that question into: 2 siblings or 5 siblings. Because everyone deserves a chance to live.
If you answered 5 siblings, you are right in so many ways. I mean, so many don't realize this until the other people are already dead: could you really walk away with knowing that you didn't save everyone you could've? I know I couldn't. I would weather die.

So, that starts up my next theory: common sense mixes with instincts and thoughs to screw your life over. You now know that you should save everyone you can... but common sense tells you to save no one, and instincts tells you to save your siblings because they come from the same womb. But, you should look past that. Look to something bigger. Something greater. The greater good. You need to know to save, no matter who it is, the greater amount. Everyone deserves to live. Even criminals. 5 criminals or 2 siblings, it's the same thing. If you save those 5 criminals karma will hit and something great will happen to you and they'll get what's coming. If you save 2 siblings, karma will hit you and your siblings for the worse.
Think about it.

Is it right?
I donno...
Maybe.
Probably.

Saturday, May 2, 2009

Theory #6

Life isn't your fairytale. Life may give you a period of time where it seems like knights, kingdoms, and princes will pop off the pages of your childhood fairytale-books...but then when you're ending on a happy key, the evil witch comes back from the dead and ruins your life once again. The witch should've been dead, but evil has this never ending quality to keep coming back. Good isn't bad enough to stand up and fight back. That's why the 60's were hopeless. In truth they saved the world, but how? Because it didn't make sense and it was different. Because something was different and it looked good everyone just accepted it. But did it look good at the time? No. But it felt good. And when people feel good, most of the times it's just thrashed anyway. For example: the 60's were trashed by the 21st century. You always think you'll want something, and then, naturally, you'll wish for it. I don't know why people haven't figured this out yet: wishes screw you over no matter what. You'll wish for something...and you'll get it...BUT you'll get it with consequences; with something that keeps you from enjoying it. You're young and everything is you're happily ever after. But, who was I? I was one of those cursed, yes cursed, some call it blessed but truly it's a curse. I was one of those who were talented with the CURSE of knowing things and being advanced in knowing. It looks from the outside like a blessing. But it's a curse because you're smart enough to figure things out earlier. Then people wonder why your having nervous breakdowns and why you're all of the sudden miserable. So, my point, you get a very short time to enjoy life.
ONLY THE GOOD WHO STAND UP WILL SUCCEED. ONLY THE GOOD WHO FIGHT WILL WIN AND GET THEIR HAPPILY EVER AFTER. BUT, BECAUSE THEY FAUGHT THEY WON'T BE GOOD. THEY'LL BE NORMAL. BECAUSE THEY FAUGHT, THEY'LL BE PART OF HISTORY, THEY'LL BE PART OF HISTORY AS A HERO. BUT HERO'S ARE FEARED. ANYONE WHO IS FEARED HAS SOME EVIL IN THEM. ANYONE WHO SHOWS THEIR EVIL BY BEING COURAGEOUS, AREN'T GOOD ANYMORE. SO, BECAUSE YOU ALREADY LOST, THERE'S NO REASON TO HAVE A CATCH. YOU FINSIHED AS A NORMAL HERO WHO IN SOME MINDS, IS FEARED.
Simple enough?

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Theory #5

I'm sure many of you have your theories on little kids...but why do think they have so much more energy than grown up people?
My theory is that because they have recently been born, and our new to life, not only are they menatlly and physically craving more...but they need to know more, to do more.

Well, short and sweet.
What do you think?
Maybe...

Theory #4

Love is a mixture of cells doing different things of hormonal changes in your life.
Does that mean--sense hormones screw up everything--they could screw up your chances of finding your one?
If it's just cells how do you know what feels good and what...well, just feels normal.

My theory is that because of the mixture of hormones, they will keep you from finding mister right. I believe that hormones are over-exaterrated.

Well, maybe....

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Theory #3

Why do writers write? What is their purpose for writing? Do they have a purpose at all? Are they just born that way? Is it influenced by the people around them? Does it really have to do with how they were raised and their childhood?

See I personally think writers are meant to be writers. Just like Lebron James is meant to be a basketball player. Like Brett Favre was meant to be a football player. Like the members in Nickleback were meant to be together to entertain the world with music. I believe that writers are meant to be what they are and born to do what they do.

The main purposes of a writer is to persuade, to entertain, or to inform-yes. But, I as a writer, personally, I have my own subject. To change. My main purpose is to change. And I think that this is the subject of all writers. Just the subject, now their sub-subject is obviously going to be more spread out and specific. My dream has been to change the world... and ever since I was little writing is how I first discovered I could do that. I discovered people loved to listen to what I had to say. So, why do writers write? Some for fame and fortune-yes. But honestly, ever TRUE writer known, probably writes to change. Even letters to the editor are meant to chang, by expression opnionated views. I think every writer has to have a purpose. Even if you're writing an article on the 'New Moon' movie coming out... they have a purpose; to inform...but also to make sure people get what they need. In that case their daily dosege of 'Twilight.' I can summarize all writing into two subjects, "Real Writing," and, "Selfish Writing." In the "Real Writing" is the main subject. People write to change; to change rumors, to change opinions, to change the world. I mean...why am I writing? To change opinions. There's my opinion on that specific part.

I believe we writers could be possibly be born that way. Is there a way we can prove that?-kind of. If we have famous writers or poets in our family, or better yet people who liked to take notes or just speak inspirationally. We could've been born that way.
But, people like me, who have no history, ancestory-wise, to the writing subject...does that mean we suck at writing? No. That means that we could've just been born that way. Possibly.

I believe writing could be very well influenced by the people around you. If people read to you when you were little or they loved telling you stories... or better yet they just told you funny family stories. One little story could have influenced your influential choice.
That's kind of one the subject of if it could have something to do with how you were raised.

Are my theories correct?
I don't know, maybe...